var questions = new Array();
var choices = new Array();
var answers = new Array();
var response = new Array();

questions[0] = "1) An employee suspected of fraud may be suspended from employment:";
choices[0] = new Array();
choices[0][0] = "only if their contract of employment contains an express power permitting them to be suspended;";
choices[0][1] = "only in circumstances amounting to “gross misconduct”";
choices[0][2] = "where there is a risk that wrongdoing will continue and further loss will be suffered if the suspect is not removed immediately";
choices[0][3] = "only if both conditions (a) and (c) are satisfied.";
answers[0] = choices[0][2];

questions[1] = "2) The use of unlawfully obtained evidence";
choices[1] = new Array();
choices[1][0] = "will always be excluded under English law as it offends against Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights;";
choices[1][1] = "may be permitted under English law although the party relying on it may be penalised in costs.";
answers[1] = choices[1][1];

questions[2] = "3) Criminal authorities are able to obtain a restraint order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 that prohibits a suspected fraudster from dealing with his assets:";
choices[2] = new Array();
choices[2][0] = "before any charges have been laid against the suspected fraudster;";
choices[2][1] = "only if the victim has started, or intends to start, civil proceedings in respect of the criminal conduct;";
choices[2][2] = "only once a confiscation order has been made;";
choices[2][3] = "only in tandem with a compensation order under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000.";
answers[2] = choices[2][0];

questions[3] = "4) Assuming that an organisation has appropriate insurance cover, the insurer should be notified that the organisation may have been the victim of fraud:";
choices[3] = new Array();
choices[3][0] = "only upon conviction of the defendant in criminal proceedings;";
choices[3][1] = "in accordance with the terms of the insurance contract;";
choices[3][2] = "only once the organisation has conducted a full investigation and can demonstrate a good arguable case against the fraudster;";
choices[3][3] = "within 6 years of the date on which the fraud occurred.";
answers[3] = choices[3][1];

questions[4] = "5) In order to preserve a defendant’s assets so that there is something against which a final order can be enforced, a victim of fraud is able to apply to the court for a:";
choices[4] = new Array();
choices[4][0] = "compensation order;";
choices[4][1] = "restraint order;";
choices[4][2] = "confiscation order;";
choices[4][3] = "freezing order.";
answers[4] = choices[4][3];

questions[5] = "6) An organisation that has been the victim of fraud has an absolute duty to notify criminal authorities in every such case:";
choices[5] = new Array();
choices[5][0] = "True;";
choices[5][1] = "False.";
answers[5] = choices[5][1];

questions[6] = "7) Which one of the following statements concerning the fraud investigation team is untrue:";
choices[6] = new Array();
choices[6][0] = "The composition of the team will depend on the particular circumstances of the case and the extent of the fraud being investigated;";
choices[6][1] = "It may be necessary to obtain advice from lawyers in foreign countries where the fraudster or his assets are in foreign countries;";
choices[6][2] = "The team should contain as many people as possible as spreading word of the existence of the investigation throughout the organisation will be key to its success;";
choices[6][3] = "In cases of complex financial fraud, the team may benefit from the involvement of a forensic accountant.";
answers[6] = choices[6][2];

questions[7] = "8) The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 together with the Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice) (Interception of Communications) Regulations 2000 prohibits employers from intercepting their employees’ telephone calls:";
choices[7] = new Array();
choices[7][0] = "in all circumstances;";
choices[7][1] = "without obtaining employees’ consent where there is a need to prevent or detect crimes;";
choices[7][2] = "unless it is in the context of broad monitoring of employees for no specific purpose;";
choices[7][3] = "under any circumstances unless the employees’ have previously consented to such monitoring.";
answers[7] = choices[7][1];

questions[8] = "9) Which one of the following statements concerning the conduct of an interview for the purposes of an internal investigation into a fraud is incorrect?";
choices[8] = new Array();
choices[8][0] = "In every case it will be necessary to caution the interviewee at the commencement of the interview;";
choices[8][1] = "A full and accurate record of the interview should be made at the earliest possible opportunity;";
choices[8][2] = "The interviewee should be discouraged from discussing the contents of their interview with others;";
choices[8][3] = "Prior to commencing interviews with employees it is important to check whether employment contracts or employee policies prescribe any procedures or protocols for the conduct of interviews.";
answers[8] = choices[8][0];

questions[9] = "10) In order to obtain a Bankers Trust Order against a bank through whom misappropriated funds have been paid, an applicant needs to be able to demonstrate:";
choices[9] = new Array();
choices[9][0] = "a prima facie case that its funds have been misappropriated and that the funds or their proceeds have been paid into or through the bank;";
choices[9][1] = "that the bank was complicit in the wrongdoing;";
choices[9][2] = "that a criminal investigation in relation to the misappropriation has been started in England and Wales and there is reasonable cause to believe that the alleged offender has benefited from his criminal conduct;";
choices[9][3] = "that notice of the application has been provided to the bank.";
answers[9] = choices[9][0];


// response for getting 100%
response[0] = "Excellent, top marks!";
// response for getting 90% or more
response[1] = "Excellent, try again to get 100%!"
// response for getting 70% or more
response[2] = "Well done, that is a good score, can you do better?";
// response for getting over 50%
response[3] = "Nice one, you got more than half of the questions right, can you do better?";
// response for getting 40% or more
response[4] = "You got some questions right, you can do better!";
// response for getting 20% or more
response[5] = "You didn't do too well, why not try again!?";
// response for getting 10% or more
response[6] = "That was pretty poor!  Try again to improve!";
// response for getting 9% or less
response[7] = "Oh dear, I think you need to go back to school (or try again)!";